Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 30.08GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2007
Crystal System
Generation
M6x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
470 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
30.08GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
M68
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy