AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1035MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (394.2GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5600M
+77%
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2020
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
394.2GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.24 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
331.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 12
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Navi 12
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
366 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
