Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M5725

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M5725

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM FirePro M5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5725 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +591%
2.989 TFLOPS
FirePro M5725
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
M96
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
M96 GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy