Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W6150M

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +81%
2.989 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2015
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Emerald
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy