Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (85W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5500M +60%
4.787 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2020
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1408
112
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.574 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.787 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 14
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XTM
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy