Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6550M

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6550M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6550M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6550M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2840MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6550M +94%
5.816 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Navi Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2840 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
16
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.88 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
181.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.63 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.816 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
363.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 24
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy