Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M4000

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M4000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +438%
3.723 TFLOPS
FirePro M4000
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Chelsea
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Chelsea XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy