Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S4000X

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S4000X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro S4000X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S4000X 's Advantages
Boost Clock775MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +275%
3.723 TFLOPS
FirePro S4000X
0.992 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
775 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.40 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.00 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
992.0 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Venus
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Venus XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy