CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
VS
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+1371%
3.723 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630M
0.253 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
VS
GeForce GT 630M
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2012
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
96
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.640 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.56 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
253.4 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.12 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GF108
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N13P-GL2-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
2
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570
3
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 A360
4
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
6
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 610
7
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6950M
8
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
9
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M
10
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy