Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 4200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +2286%
3.723 TFLOPS
NVS 4200M
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2011
Crystal System
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GF119
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N12P-NS1-S-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy