Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 820M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +1149%
3.723 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 820M
0.298 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2013
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
96
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.100 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.40 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
297.6 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GF117
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N15V-GM
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy