Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon 620 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon 620 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon 620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1024MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +373%
3.723 TFLOPS
Radeon 620 Mobile
0.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Crystal System
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.192 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.58 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
786.4 GFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
786.4 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
49.15 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Polaris 24
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Polaris 24 XL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy