Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon E2400

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon E2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +7656%
3.723 TFLOPS
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Crystal System
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
2
2048
Shading Units
40
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
RV610
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy