Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA T600 Max-Q

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA T600 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +48%
3.723 TFLOPS
T600 Max Q
2.5 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
896
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
TU117
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy