Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro S7000

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro S7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +236%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy