CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro V3900
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro V3900
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
ATI FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+1212%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
FirePro V3900
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
480
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
175W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
Turks
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FireGL V7600
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro S9050
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA NVS 1000
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy