Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1212%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
480
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Turks
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy