Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +966%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
8
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy