Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +18104%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT218
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy