Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 512MB VRAM GeForce G210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.064GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +18951%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce G210 OEM
0.043 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
504 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.064GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
43.20 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
G96C
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy