AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)

3328 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock1392MHz

Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano +283%

8.192 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2.138 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano +97%

4607

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2336

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano +154%

28

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

11

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano +200%

60

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

20

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano +167%

75

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

28

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Oct 2016

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 10

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1291 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1392 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1752 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

4GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR5

4096bit

Memory Bus

128bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

112.1GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

6

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

768

256

TMUs

48

64

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

44.54 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

66.82 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

33.41 GFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.138 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

66.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

GP107

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

GP107-400-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Pascal

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

28 nm

Process Size

14 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

3.3 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

132 mm²

Board Design

175W

TDP

75W

450 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

6.1

6.3

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition

3

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

5

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

6

AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

7

AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip