CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+53%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
5.345 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
2880
256
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GK110B
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
5
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
Related News
1
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
2
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
3
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
4
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
5
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
6
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
7
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
8
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
9
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
10
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy