Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +53%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
5.345 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
2880
256
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GK110B
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy