AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)

1280 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 's Advantages

Boost Clock1076MHz

More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano +35%

8.192 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

6.06 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

GeForce GTX 980 Ti +24%

5754

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano +16%

28

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

24

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano +33%

60

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

45

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

75

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Jun 2015

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 900

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1000 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1076 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1753 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

6GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR5

4096bit

Memory Bus

384bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

336.6GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

2816

256

TMUs

176

64

ROPs

96

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

3 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

103.3 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

189.4 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

6.060 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

189.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W

TDP

250W

450 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

GM200

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

GM200-310-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

28 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

8 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

5.2

6.3

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X

3

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

4

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 6230

5

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4550

6

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

7

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W4000

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R5 330 OEM

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU