AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

1536 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (175W vs 215W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock1770MHz

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano

8.192 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +10%

9.062 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +119%

10094

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano

28

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +50%

42

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano

60

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +33%

80

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +57%

118

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Jul 2019

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1605 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1770 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

256bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

40

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

2560

256

TMUs

160

64

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

320

-

RT Cores

40

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

113.3 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

283.2 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

18.12 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

9.062 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

283.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

TU104

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

TU104-410-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

13.6 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

545 mm²

Board Design

175W

TDP

215W

450 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 550X 640SP

2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1

3

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

4

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104

5

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 250E

6

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs Intel Xe DG1

7

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 560DX

Related News

1

Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan

2

The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation

3

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

4

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

5

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

6

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

7

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

8

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

9

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

10

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs