AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

1536 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (175W vs 215W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock1770MHz

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano

8.192 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +10%

9.062 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +119%

10095

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano

28

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +50%

42

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano

60

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +33%

80

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +57%

118

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Jul 2019

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1605 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1770 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

256bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

SM Count

40

4096

Shading Units

2560

256

TMUs

160

64

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

320

-

RT Cores

40

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

113.3 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

283.2 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

18.12 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

9.062 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

283.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W

TDP

215W

450 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

TU104

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

TU104-410-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

13.6 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM

2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

3

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R5 230

4

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3870 AGP

5

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 5470

6

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

7

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W600

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon 550

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

Related News

1

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

2

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

3

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

4

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

5

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

6

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

7

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

8

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

9

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

10

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early