Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +4776%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
120
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV630
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy