Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
4016 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +7776%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
80
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Cedar
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy