Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +2227%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
48W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV730
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy