Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +5151%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 620 OEM
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
898 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.37GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GF119
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy