Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600 +12%
9.247 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Navi 23
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy