Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +117%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
60
4096
Shading Units
3840
256
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Navi 21
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy