CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 270
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 270
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
AMD Radeon R9 270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+245%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270
2.368 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 Nano
+187%
4607
Radeon R9 270
1603
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
Radeon R9 270
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
20
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
Curacao
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 285X
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro V8800
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 OEM
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3850
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3
Related News
1
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
2
It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95
3
AMD's Strix Halo Supports Up to 128GB Memory, Clearly Designed for AI Large Language Models
4
AMD to Launch Advanced Ryzen AI PRO Series Soon
5
Intel Delays Lunar Lake Shipment: Postponed from June to September
6
Initial Test Results of AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Revealed: IPC Improvement Meets Expectations
7
Elon Musk Responds to Nvidia’s Jensen Huang: Humanoid Robots Will Be Ten Times More Common than Cars
8
AMD Revives Multi-GPU Support: Up to Four Cards and 192GB VRAM
9
TSMC Explores Advanced Chip Packaging Technology: Switches to Rectangular Substrate, Nearly Tripling Usable Area on 300mm Wafers
10
Western Digital WD Blue SN5000 SSD Launched: Up to 8TB Capacity with Mixed TLC/QLC Flash
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy