Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Sky 900

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Sky 900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +140%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon Sky 900
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Sky
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
28
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Tahiti
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Orthrus
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy