Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W2100

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Boost Clock680MHz
Lower TDP (26W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1783%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
26W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Oland
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy