Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 460 vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon RX 460 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 460
2.15 TFLOPS
FirePro D300 +1%
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Jan 2014
Arctic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
20
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy