Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 460 vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon RX 460 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 460 +15%
2.15 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
May 2011
Arctic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
Cayman
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy