Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5300
4.632 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +72%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Mar 2016
Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1327 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
96bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
144.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
9.265 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
289.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Navi 14 XE
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy