Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5300 +790%
4.632 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1327 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
400
88
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
144.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
9.265 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
289.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Redwood
Navi 14 XE
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy