Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5300 +654%
4.632 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
May 2011
Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1327 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
144.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
9.265 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
289.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Cayman
Navi 14 XE
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy