Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5300 +503%
4.632 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1327 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
144.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
9.265 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
289.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 14 XE
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy