Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 137% (1845MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5300 XT +767%
5.196 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 240 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Nov 2013
Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1670 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1845 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
384
88
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
162.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
10.39 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
324.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 14 XL
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy