Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 550X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

AMD Radeon RX 550X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 550X and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 550X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1183MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 550X +153%
1.211 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2018
Release Date
Jun 2008
Polaris
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1100 MHz
Base Clock
-
1183 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.93 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
37.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
1211 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1211 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
75.71 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GT200
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy