Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 560 vs ATI FireGL V8650

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 560 +493%
2.611 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Aug 2007
Polaris
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1175 MHz
Base Clock
-
1275 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
81.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
2.611 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.611 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
163.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
R600
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy