Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 560 vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 560 +40%
2.611 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
May 2011
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1175 MHz
Base Clock
-
1275 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
81.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
2.611 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.611 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
163.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
Cayman
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy