Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1226MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 560 XT +136%
4.394 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
May 2011
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1074 MHz
Base Clock
-
1226 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
20
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

39.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
137.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
4.394 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.394 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
274.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Cayman
Polaris 10 LE1
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy