Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 560D vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon RX 560D vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560D and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560D 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Jan 2007
Polaris
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
65.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
2.106 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.106 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
131.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
RV516
Polaris 21 XL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
R500
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy