Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 560D vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD Radeon RX 560D vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560D and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560D 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 560D +498%
2.106 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Sep 2008
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
65.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
2.106 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.106 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
131.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
48W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
RV730
Polaris 21 XL
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy