Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560D and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560D 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 560D +292%
2.106 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Sep 2008
Polaris
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
896
Shading Units
216
56
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
65.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
2.106 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.106 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
131.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
GT200
Polaris 21 XL
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy