Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1420MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 590 GME +252%
6.543 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2020
Release Date
May 2011
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1257 MHz
Base Clock
-
1420 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1280
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

45.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
204.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
6.543 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.543 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
409.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
Cayman
Polaris 20 XTR (215-0910066)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy