Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1420MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 590 GME +751%
6.543 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1257 MHz
Base Clock
-
1420 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
512
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

45.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
204.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
6.543 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.543 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
409.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Polaris 20 XTR (215-0910066)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy