Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (32W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6300
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +161%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2015
Navi II
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
32bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x HDMI 2.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Fiji
Navi 24 XL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy