Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
Lower TDP (53W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6400
3.565 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +42%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1923 MHz
Base Clock
-
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

53W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Hawaii
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy